fajar-ramadhan
The United Nations General Assembly drew to a close this week with diplomatic results that observers describe as, at best, uneven — a week of intense effort that failed to bring the US-Iran war any closer to a negotiated end. Al Jazeera's Mohammad Qasem reported from New York on the closing session's mix of breakthroughs, setbacks and finger-pointing, as the global body that has hosted the year's most crowded diplomatic calendar ended its annual meeting with the world's most dangerous unresolved conflict still unresolved.
At the centre of the impasse sits the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which a substantial share of the world's oil passes and which has become the central point of contention in the US-Iran confrontation. US President Donald Trump has rejected Iran's most recent offer to reopen the strait, according to the report, dismissing a proposal that mediators had worked to broker. The rejection leaves the waterway closed and keeps one of the war's most potent economic pressure points in place, with implications for energy markets and shipping security well beyond the region.
Tehran, for its part, has shown little urgency to engage directly with Washington. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has largely bypassed Trump, saying he is waiting to see how regional mediators respond before taking further steps on the question of the strait. The posture suggests Tehran is placing its weight on intermediary channels rather than on any expectation of direct engagement with the US president — a dynamic that diplomats say has complicated efforts to build a negotiating format.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has been even more direct about the state of relations. He said Iran no longer trusts talks with Washington, a striking admission from a leader whose country has spent months trying to use diplomacy as a lever to end the fighting. The statement underscores a broader shift inside Tehran: the belief that negotiation can be productive has given way to a view that engagement with the US is, at present, neither reliable nor safe.
Not everyone at the General Assembly framed the week's events in such stark terms. The Saudi foreign minister used his appearance at the UNGA to accuse Iran of "flagrant attacks" and to condemn the Houthi movement, adding another layer to the regional picture and pointing to wider Gulf anxieties over Tehran's conduct and its proxy network. Meanwhile, Russia's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, said Russia's war in Ukraine will continue "through to the end", a statement that underlined how little appetite exists in Moscow for a ceasefire and how the US-Iran stalemate sits within a broader global climate of unresolved conflicts.
The diplomatic picture was not uniformly bleak. Russia and Germany re-established high-level talks during the week, an indication that channels between Moscow and Berlin remain open even as fighting continues in Ukraine, where Russia has scaled up its strikes. The escalation included attacks on the country's largest steelmaker, which has halted operations — a blow to Ukrainian industry and a reminder of the wider economic costs of the war. China, meanwhile, criticised Washington's approach to the region, adding its voice to the criticism of US regional policy that has grown steadily through the year.
The Hormuz question has also produced its own subplot of rumour and uncertainty, amid continued discussion of whether Iran has captured a US submarine and why US-Iran strikes resumed in the first place after an earlier pause. These threads, alongside the framing of the resumed strikes and what they mean for peace talks, underline how far the diplomatic project remains from stable ground — and how many open questions remain about the state of the conflict and the intentions of the parties.
For diplomats, the week's central lesson is that mediation built on private channels has not yet translated into an enforceable, verifiable deal. Iran's own foreign minister is waiting on others to move first; the US president has declined the opening on the table; and Tehran's president has declared that trust in talks has broken down. Without a shared confidence-building step — most obviously the reopening of the strait that Iran says it is ready to discuss — the military and economic standoff that has defined the war looks likely to persist into the next diplomatic cycle.
What the General Assembly delivered, then, was a demonstration of how much diplomacy has been tried, and how little it has so far achieved. The week produced talking points, disputed claims, renewed channels between some capitals and blunt public rebukes aimed at others. But on the central question — whether the US and Iran can be brought to end a war that has redrawn the region's security map — the answer delivered by the world's largest gathering of governments was, on the evidence of the past seven days, no.
The coming weeks will test whether mediators can convert the week's碎片 of progress — Moscow-Berlin talks, Saudi and Chinese condemnations, Tehran's conditional overtures — into something concrete. Until the Strait of Hormuz reopens, and until Washington and Tehran agree to talk without preconditions, the diplomacy will remain what it has been all year: active, crowded and, so far, without result.
Comments (0)