Middle East Crude Exports Edge Above Pre-War Levels as Iran Dismisses Hormuz Traffic as 'Negligible'
Crude oil shipments from the Middle East climbed above their pre-war baseline on four of the seven days in the final week of September, according to provisional tracking data from
Crude oil shipments from the Middle East climbed above their pre-war baseline on four of the seven days in the final week of September, according to provisional tracking data from the shipping analytics firm Kpler, offering a paradoxical picture of a region where military confrontation and commercial traffic are running in parallel.
The figures show regional crude exports surpassing pre-war volumes on September 24 and again during the three-day stretch from September 27 to 29, when flows reached between 19.5 million and 22.5 million barrels per day. That is a notable rebound considering that, before the US-Israel war on Iran began, exports averaged roughly 18 million bpd between March 2025 and February 2026.
The data lands awkwardly against the rhetoric coming out of Tehran. In a televised interview on Sunday night, senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Ali Fadavi said only three to four million bpd were currently transiting the route, brushing off that volume as "negligible" relative to pre-war traffic. His comments appear aimed less at the statistics than at the politics surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow chokepoint through which a substantial share of global petroleum normally passes.
Fadavi also made a striking claim about the American military footprint, asserting that for the first time no US vessels were present in the Gulf, the Strait of Hormuz, the Sea of Oman or even the northern Indian Ocean. He further described US warships as "100 percent vulnerable" to IRGC attacks, a characterisation that, if accurate, would mark a significant shift in the balance of naval presence in one of the world's most strategically sensitive waterways.
Those remarks echo Iranian claims made in late September, when Tehran said it had successfully struck ships near the Strait of Hormuz, including US Navy vessels, and argued the attacks had pushed Washington to reposition its warships farther from the Iranian coastline.
The Kpler dataset captures a broader set of petroleum flows than crude alone. When crude, refined oil products, chemicals and non-gas liquids are combined, the seven-day average reached 22.4 million bpd in the period ending September 30. The narrower seven-day moving average for crude exports stood at 18.5 million bpd as of October 1. These figures encompass transits through the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea, as well as loadings at export terminals and ship-to-ship transfers conducted in the Gulf of Oman.
Liquefied natural gas traffic has also shown signs of recovery. The number of LNG cargoes leaving the Strait of Hormuz in September reached its highest monthly level since February, suggesting that gas exporters have found ways to keep shipments moving despite the security environment.
Analysts caution that the numbers come with important caveats. Vessels that crossed the strait with their automatic identification system transponders switched off — a practice used to evade detection — are excluded from the tally, meaning actual volumes could be higher, or at least differently distributed, than the tracked data indicates.
The picture on the water remains far from calm. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations agency has reported at least one attack per day in either the Strait of Hormuz or the Gulf of Aden since October 2, underscoring that the security threat to shipping has not abated even as cargo volumes recover.
Diplomatically, the standoff over the waterway shows no sign of resolution. On Sunday, Iran's top negotiator and parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed until the United States accepts Tehran's seven-day plan to reopen the waterway, a proposal Iranian officials have previously outlined as the basis for ending hostilities.
The combination of rising export figures and continued attacks presents a puzzle for oil markets and shipping companies alike. Traders must weigh the physical evidence of barrels moving against the risk premium implied by daily reports of strikes on vessels. The discrepancy between Kpler's numbers and Fadavi's "negligible" characterisation may reflect differing definitions — total regional exports versus traffic through the specifically US-supervised route in Hormuz — but it also illustrates how contested even basic facts about the conflict have become.
For global energy consumers, the stakes are considerable. The Middle East supplies a large share of the world's crude, and any sustained disruption at Hormuz would ripple through fuel prices, freight rates and inflation far beyond the region. The fact that exports have managed to exceed pre-war levels, at least intermittently, suggests that producers and shippers have adapted with alternative routes, ship-to-ship transfers and, in some cases, transponder-dark transits.
Whether that resilience can hold is another question. With attacks occurring daily, negotiations stalled and both sides issuing maximalist statements, the region's oil lifeline remains exposed to a single miscalculation. For now, the data shows the barrels are still flowing — but the conditions under which they flow grow more precarious by the week.
Comments (0)